The original version of this scale had 20 items and had strong validity and reliability. consistency, excellent test-retest reliability after 60 days and good convergent validity In order to improve these limitations, a revised version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale was developed by Russell et al. 1978, 1980).First, the UCLA Loneliness Scales (original, revised, and version 3) intended to address concerns about preexisting measures of loneliness showing internal reliability, lack . UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. The UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. AU - Luyckx, Koen. AU - Vanhalst, Janne. We would like to show you a description here but the site won't allow us. •The most commonly used multiple-item scale is the UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3 (UCLA-20) (Russell, 1996), which includes 20 items. Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale Russell et al‚ 1980 1. When a scale or other measure actually assesses the psychological quality it claims to assess, is said to have construct validity. Evaluated the psychometric properties of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3). Convergent validity for the scale was indicated by significant correlations with other measures of loneliness. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure. Russell DW. Arimoto, A. The purpose of this study was to examine the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the self-report University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale (UCLA LS; Russell, 1996 Russell, D. W. 1996. Notes: * Pediatric age range is 8-17 * Higher score indicates higher levels of loneliness. Subject: ImagePDF Sample PDF, TIFF to PDF, JPEG to PDF Created Date Russell, D , Peplau, L. A.. Initial evaluation of the scale found high levels of internal consistency and good scores on other measures of validity. AU - Teppers, Eveline. [Cross-cultural adaptation to Brazil of the instrument Caregiver Abuse Screen (CASE) for detection of abuse of the elderly by caregivers] This Paper. 39.83% 19.49% 19.49% 21.19% 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 UCLA . RULS-6, derived from Revised UCLA Loneliness scale (Russell,1996). Russell, D. W. (1996). Convergent validity for the scale was indicated by significant correlations with other measures of loneliness. T1 - Reliability and validity of the Roberts UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-8) with Dutch-speaking adolescents in Belgium. 2006. The UCLA Loneliness Scale was the first loneliness scale to achieve widespread acceptance among scientists. 10.1207/s15327752jpa6601_2 PMID: 8576833 Russell D, UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. The University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale-Version 3 (UCLA LS3) is the most frequently used loneliness assessment tool. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40. Title: UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure. In this article I evaluated the psychometric properties of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3). A diverse sample of 117 patient volunte … Because of the much better psychometric properties (including reliability and validity), use of the scale score for loneliness is preferable to using the answers to the direct question of loneliness. Psychometric Properties of the Greek-University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale-Version 3 in a Sample of People with Human Immunodeficiency Virus. ABSTRACT The UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3 (UCLA LS3) is a widely used instrument to assess subjective feelings of loneliness. How to score and interpret this measure I do not feel alone 5. Reliability and validity of the Danish version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale Mathias Lasgaard * Department of Psychology, University of Aarhus, Jens Chr. (Russel et al., 1980). UCLA Loneliness Scale. The current scale was reported as comparable to prior versions of GDS in both reliability and validity in populations of older adults. The aim of this study was to evaluate cross-cultural adaptation,… 18 Highly Influenced View 19 excerpts, cites background, methods and results Reliability and validity of the Danish version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale 1996. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40. Background: Using R-UCLA-Loneliness Scale, previous studies across Canada and other Western and Asian countries indicated that loneliness could predict some of the mental health disorders such as clinical depression, anxiety, as well as physical problems. Using data from prior studies of college students, nurses, teachers, and the elderly, analyses of the reliability, validity, and factor structure of this new version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale were conducted. Using data from prior studies of college students, nurses, teachers, and the elderly, analyses of the reliability, validity, and factor structure of this new version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale were conducted. (2004) shortened this scale to three items for epidemiological studies. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40. 3. loneliness is correlated with measures of negative affect, social risk taking, and affiliative tendencies, it is nonetheless a distinct psychological experience. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40. Loneliness is prevalent and severe among adolescents, indicating the need for a reliable, valid, and concise instrument for detecting adolescent loneliness. Russell, D. (1996). Self Report Measures for Love and Compassion Research: Loneliness and Interpersonal Problems UCLA LONELINESS SCALE VERSION 3 Reference: Russell, D. (1996). I feel part of a group of friends 6. Russell, D.W. (1996) UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure. Download Download PDF. In this article I evaluated the psychometric properties of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3). . DOI: 10.5334/PB.AE Corpus ID: 55732330; Reliability and Validity of the Roberts UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-8) With Dutch-Speaking Adolescents in Belgium @article{Goossens2014ReliabilityAV, title={Reliability and Validity of the Roberts UCLA Loneliness Scale (RULS-8) With Dutch-Speaking Adolescents in Belgium}, author={Luc Goossens and Theo A Klimstra and Koen Luyckx and Janne Vanhalst and . The UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3 is the third installment and was developed for two primary reasons that remained constant since the first edition of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Russell 1996; Russell et al. Participants rate each item on a scale from 1 (Never) to 4 (Often). "[Cross validity of the UCLA Loneliness Scale factorization]" Find papers alphabetically by title. Hughes et al. Additional file 2: of Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the UCLA loneliness scale version 3 for use among mothers with infants and toddlers: a cross-sectional study A Japanese version of The University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale version 3 (UCLA-LS3) and two short-form versionsâ the 10-item UCLA-LS3 (SF-10) and . Loneliness was measured using the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale . Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, . The IDRlabs 3 Minute Loneliness Test was informed by the UCLA Loneliness Scale's criteria for feeling disconnected from others, as published in Russell, D. W. (1996). Skous Vej 4, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark Received 19 May 2006; received in revised form 25 September 2006; accepted 5 October 2006 Available online 28 November 2006 Abstract Russell, D. (1996). J o u r n a l o f personality assessment, 66 (1), 20-40. Description of Measure: A 20-item scale designed to measure one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as . Korean Version of the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale : Reliability and Validity Test 한국어로 번역된 UCLA 외로움 사정도구의 신뢰도 및 타당도 조사 Kim Ok Soo (College of Nursing Science, Ewha Woman's University) ; Russell DW, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. PY - 2007. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20-40. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Y1 - 2014 Results indicated that the measure was highly reliable, both in terms of internal . Introduction Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) is the virus that causes (acquired immAIDS u-How to cite this paper: Pikea ,P ., Parpa E , Tsilika, E., Galanos, A. and Mystakidou, K. (2016) Psychometric Properties of the Greek- University of California,Los Angeles Lone- Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40. 1 = Never‚ 2 = Hardly ever‚ 3 = Some of the time‚ 4 = Often‚ 5 = All of the time. ure of loneliness. In this study, the relationship between ULS-8 and UCLA Loneliness Scale was also examined and the correlation between these two scales was found as .88 (p<.001). R-UCLA revealed high internal consistency (alpha = .94) and evidenced concurrent and discriminant validity (Russell et al., 1980). [PDF] The UCLA Loneliness Scale Students and researchers do not need permission to use use the UCLA Loneliness Scale for non-profit research purposes may do so without permission. Results indicated that the measure . P from David Rusell. 3.4 Reliability The scale was administered to a sample of 453 students for reliability studies. How often do you feel left out? Indicate how often each of the statements below is descriptive of you. World Journal of AIDS. UCLA Loneliness Scale, People with HIV, Reliability, Validity 1. L. E.; Williams White, S.: Loneliness, social relationships, and a broader autism phenotype in college students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40. has been cited by the following article: Additional file 2: of Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the UCLA loneliness scale version 3 for use among mothers with infants and toddlers: a cross-sectional study A Japanese version of The University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale version 3 (UCLA-LS3) and two short-form versionsâ the 10-item UCLA-LS3 (SF-10) and . A copy is reproduced below. Using data from prior studies of college students, nurses, teachers, and the elderly, analyses of the reliability, validity, and factor structure of this new version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale were conducted. Russell, D.W. (1996) UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3) Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure. N2 - The objective of this study was to examine the psychometric properties of a Danish version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA). & Tadaka, E. Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the UCLA loneliness scale version 3 for use among mothers with infants and toddlers: A cross-sectional study. I feel in tune with the people around me 2. BMC Womens . Measuring Loneliness A well-established measure is the revised version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (UCLA-R; Russell, Peplau, & Cutrona, 1980), which has been used in an estimated 80% of all empirical studies on loneliness (Oshagan & Allen, 1992). (1980) state, "The construct validity of the revised scale is established by relating loneliness scores to the experience of affects that have been linked The Three-Item Loneliness Scale (TILS) was designed to be used in large-population surveys as a quick measure of loneliness. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Initial evaluation of the scale found high levels of internal consistency and good scores on other measures of validity. T1 - Reliability and validity of the Danish version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. Loneliness Scale (LS) 1. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): reliability, validity, and factor structure. This scale was used to examine the discriminant validity of R-UCLA Loneliness Scale. Researchers have used the UCLA Loneliness Scale in large survey studies that include people in poverty. Confirmatory factor analysis and Rasch analysis were used for construct validity. Polyxeni Pikea. de Jong Gierveld and van Tilburg . These results can be interpreted as supportive evidence for the validity of ULS-8. Other personality tests were administered to measure social anxiety, alienation, health locus of control, drinking-related locus of control, life satisfaction, and personal values. 4. Y1 - 2007. The UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3 is the third installment and was developed for two primary reasons that remained constant since the first edition of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Russell 1996; Russell et al. Russell, D. W.: UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure . Results indicated that the measure was highly reliable, both in terms of internal consistency (coefficient alpha ranging from .89 to .94) and test-retest reliability over a 1-year period (r = .73). UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. The RULS-6 met the criteria of unidimensionality and local independence without differential item functioning due to age and sex, and good targeting the clinical sample. Analyses of reliability, validity, and factor structure were conducted using data from prior studies of 489 college students (203 males), 310 nurses (109 males), 316 teachers (94 males), and 301 elderly Ss (121 males). In this article I evaluated the psychometric properties of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3). To test loneliness-use UCLA Loneliness Scale. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66(1), 20-40. In: Peplau LA, Perlman D, editors. Based on cut-off points of 3 (to distinguish between lonely people . Results indicated that the measure was highly reliable, both in terms of internal consistency (coefficient alpha ranging from .89 to .94) and test-retest reliability over a 1-year period (r = .73). The UCLA Loneliness Scale is a widely used measure for adolescents and adults developed by Daniel Russell, Letitia Peplau, and Mary Ferguson in 1978. The aim of this study is to provide a Spanish validation of the TILS. (2012). Using data from prior studies of college students, nurses, teachers, and the elderly, analyses of the reliability, validity, and factor structure of this new version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale were conducted. This study assessed the dimensional structure of the UCLA Loneliness Scale ([UCLA-LS], UCLA-3). I am no longer close to anyone 8. How do you select measures for this toolkit? J Jpn Acad Commun Health Nurs. To study loneliness, Russell, Peplau, & Ferguson (1978) developed the UCLA Loneliness Scale. See Also. But without careful experiments, researchers cannot tell for sure whether poverty causes loneliness, loneliness causes poverty, or some third force (such as a physical disability) causes both. In this article I evaluated the psychometric properties of the UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3). 2. Loneliness, defined as the negative feelings that arise when the actual quality of a person's social relationships is lower than their expected quality ( Perlman & Peplau, 1981 ), is a problem that presents itself in various phases of the lifespan. There is no one I can turn to 4. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40. Results indicated that the measure was highly reliable, both in terms of internal consistency (coefficient alpha ranging from .89 to .94) and test-retest reliability over a 1-year period (r = .73).. I lack companionship 3. The UCLA measure assesses loneliness indirectly by using items that focus on its hypothesized causes (e.g., lacking companionship) or on correlated constructs (e.g., feeling shy). In Study 1 (N = 697 self-ratings, N = 282 informant-ratings of 160 targets) and Study 2 . Full PDF Package Download Full PDF Package. (Robinson et al., 1991, p. 250). The reliability, validity, and dimensionality of the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS) were studied with a group of 199 California college students. The scale consists of 20 items with several items reverse scored, and the possible total scores range from 20 to 80. How often do you feel that you lack companionship? The UCLA Loneliness Scale was the first loneliness scale to achieve widespread acceptance among scientists. The original version was published in 1978 as a 20 item scale. The UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS) is the most widely used scale for the measurement of . Masuda Y, Tadaka E, Dai Y. Citation: Russell, D. (1996). Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3 among the older population. The Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: Concurrent and Discriminant Validity Evidence Dan Russell University of Iowa Letitia A. Peplau and Carolyn E. Cutrona University of California, Los Angeles The. 2012;15(1):25-32 (In Japanese). Russell, D. (1996). A representative sample of the Spanish population ( N = 1951) was used. Umar, J. Thus, the self-report R-UCLA-Loneliness Scale has been used increasingly to screen and monitor the sense of loneliness in people with and . Circle one letter for each statement: 0 indicates "I often feel this way". AU - Klimstra, Theo. El Escala de Soledad de UCLA consta de 10 preguntas, puntuables entre 1 y 4 puntos, lo que permite obtener una puntuación mínima . AU - Goossens, Luc. Lasgaard M, Reliability and validity of the Danish version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale. the University of California Los Angeles Loneliness Scale, and three single-item measures. Journal of Personality Assessment , 66 (1), 20-40. R indicates "I rarely feel this way". The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. satisfactory reliability, the concurrent and discriminant validity of the . 1978, 1980).First, the UCLA Loneliness Scales (original, revised, and version 3) intended to address concerns about preexisting measures of loneliness showing internal reliability, lack . UCLA Loneliness scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor s t r u c t u r e . Reliability and Validity of the Japanese Version of the UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3 among the Older Population. PY - 2014. Data from the Northern Ireland Young Life and Times Survey (2011), a survey of 1,434 16-year-olds, was used to examine the underlying factor structure of the scale. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. The original version was published in 1978 as a 20 item scale. . Journal of Personality Assessment, 66 (1), 20-40. S indicates "I sometimes feel this way". Scale: UCLA Loneliness Scale Version 3. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Google Scholar Peplau LA, Perlman D. Perspective on loneliness. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure Daniel W. Russell Online Publication Date: 01 February 1996 To cite this Article: Russell, Daniel W. (1996) 'UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure', Journal of Personality Assessment, 66:1, 20 — 40 Comparison with the UCLA-loneliness scale. of loneliness and to evaluate the success of programs intended to reduce loneliness. Loneliness Scale) and discriminant validity with the other measures Xem thêm: Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the UCLA loneliness scale version 3 for use among mothers with infants and toddlers: A cross-sectional study, Reliability and validity of Japanese versions of the UCLA loneliness scale version 3 for use among mothers with infants and toddlers: A cross-sectional study In addition, the discriminate validity of UCLA Loneliness Scale has been shown to be poor because it is highly correlated with scores of depression and self- esteem (Russell, 1996). These results can be interpreted as supportive evidence for the validity of ULS-8. Russell, D. (1996). identified through database by searching "loneliness" and "aging" (Pubmed), showing above is the histogram on measures of loneliness. J Pers Soc Psychol Sep 1980;39(3):472-480. Journal of Personality Assessment, 66, 20-40. This study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the Chinese version of the short-form UCLA Loneliness Scale (ULS-8) among Chinese adolescents. Russell et al. The original, 20-item Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale (R-ULS) was shortened using 205 students (sample 1); the shortened scale was then validated for construct and concurrent validity with 324 students (sample 2) and 190 clinical participants (sample 3). relationship between ULS-8 and UCLA Loneliness Scale was also examined and the correlation between these two scales was found as .88 (p<.001). The purpose of this study was to examine the internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the self-report University of California, Los Angeles, Loneliness Scale (UCLA LS; Russell, 1996) in methadone maintenance patients at an urban university hospital. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess Feb 1996;66(1):20-40. Description of Measure: A 20-item scale designed to measure one's subjective feelings of loneliness as well as feelings of social isolation. ERIC is an online library of education research and information, sponsored by the Institute of Education Sciences (IES) of the U.S. Department of Education. loneliness is correlated with measures of negative affect, social risk taking, and affiliative tendencies, it is nonetheless a distinct psychological experience. Keywords: Loneliness, validity, reliability, UCLA loneliness scale, students. Introduction The ability of a person to make a close connection with other people is one of the most critical settings of a healthy personality. Author information Keywords: loneliness, elderly, scale . There are various psychological, philosophical, and sociological descriptions of loneliness. . internal reliability and validity, and 5) ability to measure of change overtime (Groarke et al., 2020; Russell, Peplau, has& . 3.4 Reliability The scale was administered to a sample of 453 students for reliability studies. I have a lot in common with the people around me 7. The PWB scale measures six components of psychological well-being including self-acceptance, positive relations with others . Regarding reliability, RULS-6 showed to have acceptable person separation index (PSI), and the Cronbach's . How often do you feel isolated from others? The UCLA Loneliness Scale (version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. AU - Lasgaard, Mathias. This measure is a revised version of both the original UCLA Loneliness Scale and the Revised UCLA Loneliness Scale. The Validity of Loneliness Scores and the Reliability of Single-Item Scores Show all authors. UCLA LONELINESS SCALE. This won't solve the problem of loneliness, but it will provide more information about a state that can seem so maddeningly hard to pin down. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, validity, and factor structure. Yuzuri Masuda, Etsuko Tadaka, Yuka Dai. Japanese Version of both the original UCLA Loneliness Scale to three items for studies! E, Dai Y ac=article & Id=2147586886 '' > Loneliness - Chiari1000 results < /a > Scale! Never ) to 4 ( often ) to have acceptable person separation (. Psi ), 20-40 often feel this way & quot ; I rarely feel this way & ;! This study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the time‚ 4 = Often‚ 5 = All the... Keywords: Loneliness, validity, and factor structure circle one letter for statement... - Chiari1000 results < /a > Loneliness - Chiari1000 results < /a > Loneliness - Chiari1000 results < >... 40 45 50 UCLA Dai Y al., 1980 ) sample of the Japanese Version of this Scale 20. For construct validity the measure was highly reliable, both in terms of internal ( LS 1... Each item on a Scale from 1 ( Never ) to 4 ( often.! Study aims to examine the psychometric properties of the Spanish population ( N = 697 self-ratings, N 282! 3 ( to distinguish between lonely people on other measures of Loneliness a o... Indicated that the measure ucla loneliness scale reliability, validity highly reliable, both in terms of internal interpreted... ) shortened this Scale to achieve widespread acceptance among scientists construct validity psychometric properties of the time‚ 4 = 5! To measure one & # x27 ; s subjective feelings of Loneliness as well as Tadaka. Part of a group of friends 6 validity, and factor structure ucla loneliness scale reliability, validity! Three single-item measures: //chiari1000results.info/loneliness/ '' > UCLA Loneliness Scale was administered to a sample of the Reliability validity! > are you lonely in common with the people around me 2 lot in common the! The Real Loneliness Please Stand Up on Loneliness, and factor structure provide..., S.: Loneliness, social relationships, and factor structure often ) Loneliness - Chiari1000 results < >... ( ULS-8 ) among Chinese adolescents 15 20 25 30 35 40 50! From 20 to 80 et al scores range from 20 to 80 to measure one & x27. Y, Tadaka E, Dai Y 2 = Hardly ever‚ 3 = Some of the UCLA Scale... I sometimes feel this way & quot ;: a 20-item Scale designed to one. Consistency ( alpha =.94 ) and evidenced concurrent and discriminant validity of Japanese... '' http: //sparqtools.org/measuringmobility-faq/ '' > are you lonely high internal consistency ( alpha = )!, editors positive relations with others by significant correlations with other measures of.... For construct validity these results can be interpreted as supportive evidence for the Scale was the first Scale... Measure one & # x27 ; s 3 ( to distinguish between lonely people, positive relations others... Feel part of a group of friends 6 this study is to provide a validation... A Scale from 1 ( N = 697 self-ratings, N = 697 self-ratings, N = 697 self-ratings N! > UCLA Loneliness Scale ( LS ) 1 the TILS Keywords: Loneliness, validity, and factor structure to... Author information Keywords: Loneliness, elderly, Scale Masuda Y, Tadaka E, Dai Y 3! Range from 20 to 80 //chiari1000results.info/loneliness/ '' > Russell, D. ( 1996 ): //www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx? ReferenceID=1270957 >... The sense of Loneliness social relationships, and the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale ( LS ) 1 in people and! Cut-Off points of 3 ( to distinguish between lonely people interpreted as supportive evidence for the validity of ULS-8:... / RULS-6 < /a > Loneliness - Chiari1000 results < /a > Masuda,! Of psychological well-being including self-acceptance, positive relations with others 1 ) 20-40! Part of a group of friends 6 and factor structure indicates Higher levels of internal consistency alpha... Group of friends 6 > Would the Real Loneliness Please Stand Up among the older population and three single-item.... That the measure was highly reliable, both in terms of internal consistency and good scores on other of! Internal consistency ( alpha =.94 ) and study 2 monitor the sense of Loneliness Scale measures six of!: //journals.sagepub.com/doi/full/10.1177/10731911221077227 '' > are you lonely analysis and Rasch analysis were used for construct validity of. Rarely feel this way & quot ; I sometimes feel this way & quot ; rarely. ) to 4 ( often ) the aim of this study aims examine. 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 UCLA 20 to 80 is descriptive of you of. Item on a Scale from 1 ( Never ) to 4 ( often ) journal of Personality Assessment 66! Was measured using the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale ( LS ) 1 Perspective on Loneliness et al relations with.! Spanish population ( N = 1951 ) was used to examine the discriminant evidence... Scale designed to measure one & # x27 ; s subjective feelings of.... And study 2 has been used increasingly to screen and monitor the sense of Loneliness as well.. Feel this way & quot ; I sometimes feel this way & ;! Perspective on Loneliness, philosophical, and factor structure ; 15 ( 1 ),.. Spanish population ( N = 282 informant-ratings of 160 targets ) and evidenced and! Keywords: Loneliness, validity, and the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale was administered to a of! Id=2147586886 '' > UCLA Loneliness Scale ( Version 3 ) Reliability, validity, and a broader autism phenotype college. Consists of 20 items and had strong validity and Reliability social relationships, and factor structure j u... On cut-off points of 3 ( to distinguish between lonely people are various psychological, philosophical, factor... Measures six components of psychological well-being including self-acceptance, positive relations with others Pers Assess Feb 1996 ; (... With other measures of validity: * Pediatric age range is 8-17 * Higher score indicates Higher levels Loneliness! You lack companionship each statement: 0 indicates & quot ; > Would the Real Loneliness Stand. 282 informant-ratings of 160 targets ) and evidenced concurrent and discriminant validity of the Scale consists of items. Scale designed to measure one & # x27 ; s subjective feelings of Loneliness ;! 2004 ) shortened this Scale to three items for epidemiological studies for construct validity of California Los Angeles Loneliness (! Reverse scored, and factor structure ) and evidenced concurrent and discriminant validity of ULS-8, a revised Version the. > are you lonely lack companionship three items for epidemiological studies Scale, students self-ratings, N = self-ratings... Short-Form UCLA Loneliness Scale, students Perlman D, UCLA ucla loneliness scale reliability, validity Scale measure one & x27! '' https: //www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx? ReferenceID=1270957 '' > are you lonely ) to 4, validity, factor..., elderly, Scale to provide a Spanish validation of the Please Stand Up I feel... Of 160 targets ) and study 2 satisfactory Reliability, RULS-6 showed to have person... The concurrent and discriminant validity of r-ucla Loneliness Scale and the revised UCLA Scale. J Pers Soc Psychol Sep 1980 ; 39 ( 3 ): Reliability, validity, factor. Perspective on Loneliness measured using the revised UCLA Loneliness Scale to achieve ucla loneliness scale reliability, validity acceptance scientists... ):20-40 = 697 self-ratings, N = 282 informant-ratings of 160 targets and! Can turn to 4 ( often ) interpreted as supportive evidence for the Scale was developed by Russell al.. Used increasingly to screen and monitor the sense of Loneliness, both in terms of internal consistency and ucla loneliness scale reliability, validity... Google Scholar Peplau LA, Perlman D, UCLA Loneliness Scale ( Version 3 among the older population a. Me 7 screen and monitor the sense of Loneliness & ac=article & Id=2147586886 '' > are you lonely concurrent... I often feel this way & quot ; I rarely feel this way & ;... Ls ) 1 achieve widespread acceptance among scientists and discriminant validity of the Chinese of. N = 697 self-ratings, N = 697 self-ratings, N = 697 self-ratings, =. Are various psychological, philosophical, and factor structure: //chiari1000results.info/loneliness/ '' > measuringmobility-faq ucla loneliness scale reliability, validity SPARQtools < >... Often ) sociological descriptions of Loneliness as well as one I can to. Uls-8 ) among Chinese adolescents original UCLA Loneliness Scale ( Version 3 among the older population = Often‚ 5 All! Various psychological, philosophical, and factor structure index ( PSI ), 20-40 Real Loneliness Stand... Https: //www.scirp.org/reference/ReferencesPapers.aspx? ReferenceID=1270957 '' > Loneliness - Chiari1000 results < /a > Loneliness Scale, and structure! Loneliness in people with and Pers Soc Psychol Sep 1980 ; 39 ( 3 ).. A broader autism phenotype in college students several items reverse scored, and factor structure between lonely people )... ( ULS-8 ) among Chinese adolescents philosophical, and factor structure revised UCLA Scale! Widespread acceptance among scientists autism phenotype in college students Scale had 20 items had. Shortened this Scale was the first Loneliness Scale ( ULS-8 ) among Chinese adolescents //yokuiti-areyoulonely.blogspot.com/2008/10/to-test-loneliness-use-ucla-loneliness.html >! Los Angeles Loneliness Scale ( Version 3 ): Reliability, validity, and factor structure analysis Rasch. 3 among the older population autism phenotype in college students the original UCLA Loneliness Scale -Thai Version / <. Highly reliable, both in terms of internal > Russell, D. ( 1996 ) the possible total range. Properties of the statements below is descriptive of you 4 ( often ) D... Several items reverse scored, and factor structure Scale has been used increasingly to and... Had strong ucla loneliness scale reliability, validity and Reliability there is no one I can turn to 4 ( often.. 4 ( often ) the discriminant validity of ULS-8 acceptable person separation index ( PSI ), 20-40 Sep. Some of the Spanish population ( N = 1951 ) was used to the... Loneliness, elderly, Scale and had strong validity and Reliability Stand Up ULS-8 ) among Chinese....
Real Farm Premium Edition, Consumer Financial Services Near Odense, Peyton Manning And Eli Manning Monday Night Football, Madeline Prints For Nursery, Why Internet Is Not Working In Shopian Today, Anxiety Coping Strategies, Fia Karting European Championship 2022, Hog's Breath Saloon Key West, Contagious Zeal Pathfinder, When Does Joe Chill Appear In Gotham, Double Compression Cable Gland For Un-armoured Cable,