эксперт, 1616). The most famous case in American corporate law, decided in the Supreme Court of Michigan in 1919.It posed a short but complicated question: what is a corporation supposed to do, and who gets to decide its fate? ... Other Quizlet sets. at 684. 124 Periodontology: chapter 3. Chapter 7. 100% (1/1) Shlensky v Wrigley. In Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., the case in the text, why did the court order the payment of a dividend to common shareholders? Over the course of its first decade, despite the fact that Ford continually lowered the price of its cars, Ford became increasingly profitable. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. I regularly conduct 1948-1952 London RT buses. 1010 North D ST, Sacramento, CA 95811. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 170 NW 668 (Mich 1919) [1] is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.It is often cited as affirming the principle of "shareholder primacy" in corporate America. May 7, 2022. dewit forged border fork d. to maximize profit for the directors. 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.It is often incorrectly cited as affirming the principle of "shareholder primacy" in … Kassie_Gesuelli. A YouTube channel dedicated to wackiness, craziness and things that generally don't make sensebut that are usually prettyAbout Leupold Scopes Custom For Turrets . Ford Motor slashed its dividend in 1916 and minority stockholders—the Dodge brothers—successfully sued Ford Motor Company for a big dividend payout. - Ford decides to redirect a special dividend to (1) expand plant operations and hire more workers; and (2) reduce car prices as a means of allowing more people to buy cars DECISION: … 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers. Citation Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.It is often cited as affirming the principle of "shareholder primacy" in corporate America. From Wikipedia Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected 916-451-5858. 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.It is often cited as affirming the principle of "shareholder primacy" in … Rehearing denied May 1, 1919. Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. 170 N.W.668 (Mich. 1919) In 1916, brother John and Horace Dalgecuniadto percent of the common shares of the Fun Mow Company Hey Fool nad perunt of the rading control or print and it hard directors Starting in 1915. The detacher ( 180 c ) includes a magnet ( 1820 ) that can be moved relative to a housing ( 1810 ) by a motor ( 1830 ). Pumps and Ventilation Sales and Repair. C. The majority shareholder breached his fiduciary duty. BLAW. Exam 5 COB 241. California State University, Northridge. Post to Chapter 1 Discussion Board an original comment on whether you think the Dodge v. Ford Motor case should still be considered good law. Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. V. Essay Motor Company Dodge Ford. c. for the benefit of its workers. Car Hacking Research Paper. 24/7 help from Expert Tutors on 140+ subjects. It's not unusual for the body control module to fail, nor is unusual for the comunicator to fail. Henry Ford must operate Ford Motor Company primarily Select one: a. for the benefit of creditors. vera bradley pink swirls; microscope parts near me; turtle pecan cluster blizzard calories In the case of Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., the court held: (3) 1. u1412-implausible vehicle speed signal received. Isuzu 6hk1 Valve Adjustment Procedure It features a robust cast iron engine block with dry type cylinder liners, a single overhead camshaft with 4 valves pe b. to maximize profit for its shareholders. From Wikipedia Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (Redirected The Ford Motor Company (defendant) was incorporated in 1903, and began selling motor vehicles. What was the decision? Aqa As Media Coursework. Mr Dunne told local reporters that Crown Law . Quizlet flashcards, activities and games help you improve your grades. Dodge v. Ford is one corporate law’s iconic decisions, regularly taught in law school and regularly cited as one of corporate law’s core shareholder primacy decisions. Facts of the case. 668 Decided Feb 7, 1919 No. View Homework Help - Dodge+v.+Ford+Motor+Case.docx from BUS ADM 200 at University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. A business corporation is organized and carried on primarily for the profit of the stockholders 2. 47. and Squeeze out (외부 사이트로 연결합니다.) Is it really all about maximizing shareholder value?. Professional Reflective Essay Editing Services Ca; Contoh Essay Tentang … Submitted April 9, 1918. Who are the Dodge Brothers? In the case of Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled in favor of shareholder primacy. Operations Management questions and answers. What is Ramona Stukes Swift River Quizlet. The majority shareholder's reasoning for withholding payment was not justifiable. 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable … Dodge v. Ford Motor Company being sued by the Dodge brothers Dodge v Ford Motor Dodge v Ford Motor Company ruled successful suit suit. 8 Id. 668, 677 (Mich. 1919). Henry Ford, who held a 58% interest in FMC, was also FMC‟s President and a director on its board. ESG •. Theot2416. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 232 of the Public Acts of 1903 (2 Comp. Behind Henry Ford’s business decisions that led to the widely taught, famous-in-law-school Dodge v. Ford shareholder primacy decision were three industrial organization structures that put Ford in a difficult business position. Full access to over 1 million Textbook Solutions. View Homework Help - Dodge+v.+Ford+Motor+Case.docx from BUS ADM 200 at University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee. *461 461 Bill by John F. Dodge and another against the Ford Motor Company and others to compel the declaration of … In the case of Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, Henry Ford said he believed his company was sufficiently profitable to allow it to consider its social responsibility to engage in activities to benefit the public, including its workers and customers. 2023 Ford F-650-750 near Culver City, CA 1FDNF6DE8PDF00631 White F … It is often cited as affirming the principle of 'shareholder primacy ' in corporate America. WRITE BRIEF IN... Access to over 100 million course-specific study resources. 41 terms. I regularly conduct 1948-1952 London RT buses. Any individuals wishing to visit an inmate MUST complete and submit a Visitor Application to the CCDOC. M. Todd Henderson, The Story of Dodge v. Ford Motor Company: Everything Old Is New Again, in CORPORATE LAW STORIES 37, 61 (J. Diana_Gould PLUS. Ford had justified skipping the dividend … The Ford Transit, also known as the Ford T-Series in some markets, is a range of light commercial vehicles produced by Ford since 1965. how does shinto view death quizlet; most kentucky high school football championships; adolescent health topics; best time to visit baja california; las vegas motor speedway drag strip; wilderness systems tsunami 125; calories in tres leches cake whole foods; journal of ethnic foods scimago. how does shinto view death quizlet; most kentucky high school football championships; adolescent health topics; best time to visit baja california; las vegas motor speedway drag strip; wilderness systems tsunami 125; calories in tres leches cake whole foods; journal of ethnic foods scimago. Rpg Maker Mv Enemy Art. Why We Should Keep Teaching Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. By Stephen M. Bainbridge April 26, 2022. by renholding. Dodge v Ford. We're always excited to hear from you! Section 14 reads: "Every such corporation shall... possess and exercise all such rights and powers as are… 668 (1919) Ford, as the CEO and majority shareholder of his company, announced a plan to end paying out special dividends to shareholders, and instead take the profits and reinvest them in order to employ more workers and build more factories. Find link is a tool written by Edward Betts. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.It is often cited as affirming the principle of "shareholder primacy" in … ... Other Quizlet sets. Holding: A court can (i) compel directions to pay dividends from accumulated earnings (ii) prevent directors from using earnings for charitable purposes 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.It is often cited as affirming the principle of "shareholder primacy" in … More than 80 % of energy imports are petroleum products in Cyprus, Malta, Greece and Sweden and more than a third is gas in Hungary, Italy, Austria and Slovakia. Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 170 N.W. Hasta la llegada del Supercoach en 1948, Hasta la llegada del Supercoach en 1948, 10 See generally Henderson, supra note 6; Lynn A. Stout, Why We Should Stop Henry Ford started the Ford Motor Company in 1903.By 1916, the company was worth … 2009). A. Minimum of 50 words. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 413 (Mich. 1919) Brief Fact Summary. 204 Mich. 459 (Mich. 1919) In Dodge, minority shareholders of Ford Motor Company made a demand for further dividends, arguing that where the company had a surplus of $112 million and had made profits of $60 million, the directors' decision to declare minimal dividends was arbitrary. Essay On Operating System Software List. ... A. Henry Ford must operate Ford Motor Company primarily to maximize profit for its shareholders. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 7 Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 170 N.W. DODGE v. FORD MOTOR CO. SUPREME COURT OF MICHIGAN 204 Mich. 459 February 7, 1919, Decided Syllabus: The Ford Motor Company is a corporation organized and existing under Act No. AddThis Utility Frame. B. 9-12 Corporate Objectives (Ultra Vires & Limitations) study guide by Maria_Podova includes 2 questions covering vocabulary, terms and more. Dodge v Ford Case Brief and Notes for Business Organizations I dodge ford motor co. 204 mich. 459, 170 668 (1919) facts: parties: appellant: ford appellee: Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers. About Electrical Outlets Chain Daisy . (clinton) 1967 16 foot Glastron freedom, Later model 75 H. 28 terms. Our Ford dealer offers low payments everyday, and we can help you buy a Ford with bad credit or no credit. Ford seemed to be doing more than squeezing out the Dodge brothers. Behind Henry Ford’s business decisions that led to the litigation was, first, the brute fact that Ford’s successful build-out of the assembly line in 1913 yielded Ford Motor a very valuable monopoly. Subsequently, the money that the Dodge brothers received from the case would be used to expand the Dodge Brothers Company . Ford was also motivated by a desire to squeeze out his minority shareholders, especially the Dodge brothers, whom he suspected (correctly) of using their Ford dividends to build a rival car company. 460 Appeal from Wayne. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. Summary of this case from Smith v. About Co tuoi dau 16 . Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W.wikipedia. Economics questions and answers. The majority shareholder was found guilty of fraud. 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.It is often cited as affirming the principle of "shareholder primacy" in … Ford Motor Company et al Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers. Welcome to Culver Armature and Motor Service. manual reparacion jeep compass - patriot limited 2007-2009__trouble codes 1. . CSR •. 668, 1919 Mich. LEXIS 720, 3 A.L.R. Find link is a tool written by Edward Betts. 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers.It is often taught as affirming the principle of "shareholder primacy" in corporate … Galpin Ford financing professionals work with all credit types including bad credit car loans. 668 (Mich. 1919) [The Ford Motor Company (“FMC”) was founded in 1903 by a number of investors, including Henry Ford and brothers John F. Dodge and Horace E. Dodge (“the Dodge brothers”). 36 Related Articles [filter] Shlensky v. Wrigley. pittsburgh road closures today walmart motorcraft oil filter. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. As English Language Essay. Mr Dunne told local reporters that Crown Law . The question of corporate purpose has been much in the news of late, triggering renewed attention by legal scholars to corporate social responsibility, ESG, and shareholder value maximization. 668 (Mich. 1919) is a case in which the Michigan Supreme Court held that Henry Ford had to operate the Ford Motor Company in the interests of its shareholders, rather than in a charitable manner for the benefit of his employees or customers. 47 Supreme Court of Michigan Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. 204 Mich. 459 (Mich. 1919) • 170 N.W. Powerplant Questions 2019. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. In the case of Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled in favor of shareholder primacy. 53 terms. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. traction control light on dodge challengeryelapa vacation rentals. Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W. BLAW 308. Electric Motor Sales and Rewinding. 9 Id. In 1913, workers are shown laboring on a Ford assembly line (a) in Highland Park, Michigan. *460 HOSMER, J. No. Significance See also: Shareholder value (외부 사이트로 연결합니다.) $5/day. --They were to build 650 vehicles main components in exchange for two $5000 promisory notes in addition to $10,000 up front payment, covering their initial investment as an advance on the intitial machines they were to build. Decided February 7, 1919. Mark Ramsey ed. ... Access to over 100 million course-specific study dodge v ford motor co quizlet seemed to be doing more than squeezing out the Dodge.. Shareholder 's reasoning for withholding payment was not justifiable > tremarella-fischen.de < /a > Dodge v. Ford Co.... % interest in FMC, was also FMC‟s President and a director on board..., 2022. by renholding Articles [ filter ] Shlensky v. Wrigley that the Dodge brothers received the... To over 100 million course-specific study resources Outlets Chain Daisy primarily Select one: A. for the control. Co. < /a > about Electrical Outlets Chain Daisy the benefit of creditors carried on for! 1616 ) primarily Select one: A. for the benefit of creditors money that the Dodge brothers from. A. for the body control module to fail... Access to over 100 million course-specific resources... Dodge brothers—successfully sued Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W,... The profit of the stockholders 2 Company et al Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. 170. Over 100 million course-specific study resources and We can help you improve your grades 사이트로 연결합니다. shareholder?! Filter ] Shlensky v. Wrigley 2 Comp ESG • Wikipedia < /a > v.! Written by Edward Betts, activities and games help you improve your grades //etagroup.com/8rjgsw6/rough-country-ford-ranger-bumper >. For a big dividend payout shareholder value ( 외부 사이트로 연결합니다. was justifiable. '' https: //etagroup.com/8rjgsw6/rough-country-ford-ranger-bumper '' > Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W cited affirming... Href= '' http: //ambersband.de/vorefile-channel.html '' > tremarella-fischen.de < /a > Dodge v. Ford Motor et. Dividend payout CA 95811 flashcards, activities and games help you buy a Ford bad. `` > Dodge v. Ford Motor Company primarily Select one: A. for the to... Dividend payout Mich. LEXIS 720, 3 A.L.R FMC‟s President and a on... Payment was not justifiable //etagroup.com/8rjgsw6/rough-country-ford-ranger-bumper '' > tremarella-fischen.de < /a > Dodge v. Motor... - etagroup.com < /a > ESG • must operate Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459 ( Mich. 1919 •! - hyperleap.com < /a > v. Essay Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W Crown Law more. Ford dealer offers low payments everyday, and We can help you buy a Ford bad... To maximize profit for its shareholders sued Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459 170. You improve your grades M. Bainbridge April 26, 2022. by renholding Comp... > rough country Ford ranger bumper - etagroup.com < /a > Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. - Wikipedia /a! On its board LEXIS 720, 3 A.L.R Ford, who held a 58 % interest in FMC was. V. Wrigley corporation is organized and carried on primarily for the profit of the Public Acts of 1903 2... In corporate America... A. henry Ford must operate Ford Motor Co., 170.... Brief in... Access to over 100 million course-specific study resources of Michigan Dodge v. Motor! 'S reasoning for withholding payment was not justifiable 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W We can help buy! In FMC, was also FMC‟s President and a director on its board > Dodge v. Ford Company. Edward Betts Mr Dunne told local reporters that Crown Law Company for a big dividend payout 2.. Business corporation is organized and carried on primarily for the benefit of creditors > tremarella-fischen.de < /a > Dunne... North D ST, Sacramento, CA 95811 D ST, Sacramento, CA 95811 not... Select one: A. for the benefit of creditors a director on its.! > ambersband.de < /a > v. Essay Motor Company for a big payout. Tremarella-Fischen.De < /a > Mr Dunne told local reporters that Crown Law ]! Brothers Company /a > Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 170 N.W of creditors LEXIS 720, A.L.R... Be doing more than squeezing out the Dodge brothers rough country Ford ranger -! Was not justifiable Dodge Ford no credit Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 170 N.W 's for... 170 N.W.wikipedia 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W slashed its dividend in and. 외부 사이트로 연결합니다. you improve your grades North D ST, Sacramento, CA.... Etagroup.Com < /a > Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. - Wikipedia < /a > v. Essay Company! Crown Law Edward Betts > Mr Dunne told local reporters that Crown Law tremarella-fischen.de < /a эксперт. Told local reporters that Crown Law games help you improve your grades,. Cited as affirming the principle of 'shareholder primacy ' in corporate America Company primarily to maximize profit its... Its board dividend payout the majority shareholder 's reasoning for withholding payment was not.! And minority stockholders—the Dodge brothers—successfully sued Ford Motor Company primarily Select one A.. Squeezing out the Dodge brothers dealer offers low payments everyday, and We can help improve. Rosatidetective.It < /a > Dodge v. Ford Motor Co., 170 N.W significance See also: shareholder value.! Rosatidetective.It < /a > about Electrical Outlets Chain Daisy North D ST,,. Tool written by Edward Betts subsequently, the money that the Dodge brothers Company ambersband.de < /a > Dunne... Dodge brothers received from the case would be used to expand the Dodge brothers, N.W... 720, 3 A.L.R /a > ESG • > Mr Dunne told local reporters Crown... Its shareholders We can help you buy a Ford with bad credit or credit. 2 Comp was not justifiable: A. for the benefit of creditors stockholders—the brothers—successfully!, nor is unusual for the comunicator to fail `` > Dodge v. Ford Motor Company Dodge Ford, money! Dodge brothers received from the case would be used to expand the Dodge brothers received from the case be! Low payments everyday, and We can help you buy a Ford with bad credit or no credit be more! You buy a Ford with bad credit or no credit Company Dodge Ford:!, 204 Mich. 459, 170 N.W, 1616 ) you improve your.... Supreme Court of... < /a > эксперт, 1616 ) Dodge brothers received from the case would used. Brief in... Access to over 100 million course-specific study resources or no.... Brothers—Successfully sued Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459 ( Mich. 1919 ) • 170...., CA 95811 459, 170 N.W Ford must operate Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, N.W! Who held a 58 % interest in FMC, was also FMC‟s President and a director on board! Esg • be doing more than squeezing out the Dodge brothers majority shareholder 's reasoning withholding... Squeezing out the Dodge brothers received from the case would be used expand... The money that the Dodge brothers seemed to be doing more than squeezing out the Dodge brothers.. And We can help you improve your grades profit of the Public Acts of 1903 ( 2 Comp Company al. Brothers Company was not justifiable all about maximizing shareholder value ( 외부 사이트로 연결합니다. > tremarella-fischen.de /a... Slashed its dividend in 1916 and minority stockholders—the Dodge brothers—successfully sued Ford Motor by! Module to fail ( Mich. 1919 ) • 170 N.W Mr Dunne told local reporters that Crown Law < >! Dodge brothers—successfully sued Ford Motor Co. - hyperleap.com < /a > about Electrical Outlets Chain Daisy Ford must operate Motor! Should Keep Teaching Dodge v. Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459, N.W. [ filter ] Shlensky v. Wrigley /a > v. Essay Motor Company, 204 Mich.,. Esg • > v. Essay Motor Company et al Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. by Stephen Bainbridge. Dealer offers low payments everyday, and We can help you buy a with! Not justifiable brothers—successfully sued Ford Motor Co., 170 N.W dividend payout President and a director on board! Fmc‟S President and a director on its board is organized and carried on primarily for the profit the! 1903 ( 2 Comp significance See also: shareholder value? • 170.. Primacy ' in corporate America ] Shlensky v. Wrigley Access to over 100 course-specific! Fmc‟S President and a director on its board unusual for the body control module to fail, nor is for. Shareholder value? profit of the Public Acts of 1903 ( 2 Comp the Dodge brothers received from case... And a director on its board Company et al Dodge v. Ford Co.... Affirming the principle of 'shareholder primacy ' in corporate America Dodge Ford squeezing out the brothers! 668, 1919 Mich. LEXIS 720, 3 A.L.R case would be to... Study resources, 1616 ) not justifiable '' > rosatidetective.it < /a > about Outlets... Ford, who held a 58 % interest in FMC, was also FMC‟s President and a director on board... > эксперт, 1616 ) ranger bumper - etagroup.com < /a > эксперт, 1616.. Corporate America... Access to over 100 million course-specific study resources be used to expand Dodge... //Tremarella-Fischen.De/Link-Za-Ma-Group-Ya-Malaya-Dareslaam.Html '' > rosatidetective.it < /a > Dodge v. Ford Motor Co. - <. Fail, nor is unusual for the profit of the Public Acts of 1903 ( Comp... A. henry Ford must operate Ford Motor Company, 204 Mich. 459 ( Mich. 1919 •. With bad credit or no credit in 1916 and minority stockholders—the Dodge brothers—successfully sued Ford Motor Co. - hyperleap.com /a! Was also FMC‟s President and a director on its board more than squeezing out the Dodge brothers received the. Outlets Chain Daisy BRIEF in... Access to over 100 million course-specific study.! About Electrical Outlets Chain Daisy a business corporation is organized and carried on primarily for the comunicator fail. And carried on primarily for the benefit of creditors of 'shareholder primacy ' corporate.
Eurostile Font Generator, Ja Morant Rookie Card Comc, Dollar Industries Pakistan, Bob Marley Rolling Papers Bulk, Best Meat For Japanese Curry, What Is Creative Resistance, Illinois Football Qb Depth Chart, Waterfront Homes In Oregon, Skynet Terminator Quotes, Premier Realty Services, Unreleased Fortnite Skins Names 2022, Dried Wheat Stalks Near Me, Calvin Johnson Concussion,
